<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Matthew C Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog</link>
	<description>Musician, Web Developer, Hobbyist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Fat Head II Ribbon Mic Clips by Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/2010/02/22/fat-head-ii-ribbon-mic-clips/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/?p=764#comment-734</guid>
		<description>Sounds good! I&#039;d like to hear it on acoustic instruments, such as an acoustic guitar or drums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good! I&#8217;d like to hear it on acoustic instruments, such as an acoustic guitar or drums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Teh Internets are Teh Idiots by Kristina</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/2010/02/12/teh-internets-are-teh-idiots/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/?p=762#comment-729</guid>
		<description>Made me think of this: http://notalwaysright.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Made me think of this: <a href="http://notalwaysright.com/" rel="nofollow">http://notalwaysright.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vonnegut Talks About Art by matt</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/2010/01/21/vonnegut-talks-about-art/comment-page-1/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/?p=751#comment-726</guid>
		<description>Sorry Jon, didn&#039;t see your comment come in to my email.  It&#039;s up now, and it&#039;s a good one.  I would say that implicit in what Vonnegut is saying about what people like to look at is a little bit of the test of time - what people *continue* to like to look at (and think about).  That will generally rule out any specific lolcat, though perhaps not the the lolcat phenomenon.  Which I think is roughly the right thing to do.  Your second point is dead on, i think.  But to be fair, Vonnegut does bring it up after he brings up a few other things, so maybe its a secondary point.  But I think you raise a good one.  There are DEFINITELY some pieces of art that just KNOCK YOU FLAT without knowing anything about the artist.  As soon as I saw Winged Victory of Samothrace, I almost passed out.  Look it up - it&#039;s one of the most beautiful things I&#039;ve ever seen.  In that case, nobody even knows the specific individual that made the thing.  Even if we didn&#039;t know the *civilization* that crafted the darn thing, it would still knock me flat.  Every time.  EVERY. TIME.  I&#039;m getting a little teary-eyed just thinking about it.  Point conceded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Jon, didn&#8217;t see your comment come in to my email.  It&#8217;s up now, and it&#8217;s a good one.  I would say that implicit in what Vonnegut is saying about what people like to look at is a little bit of the test of time &#8211; what people *continue* to like to look at (and think about).  That will generally rule out any specific lolcat, though perhaps not the the lolcat phenomenon.  Which I think is roughly the right thing to do.  Your second point is dead on, i think.  But to be fair, Vonnegut does bring it up after he brings up a few other things, so maybe its a secondary point.  But I think you raise a good one.  There are DEFINITELY some pieces of art that just KNOCK YOU FLAT without knowing anything about the artist.  As soon as I saw Winged Victory of Samothrace, I almost passed out.  Look it up &#8211; it&#8217;s one of the most beautiful things I&#8217;ve ever seen.  In that case, nobody even knows the specific individual that made the thing.  Even if we didn&#8217;t know the *civilization* that crafted the darn thing, it would still knock me flat.  Every time.  EVERY. TIME.  I&#8217;m getting a little teary-eyed just thinking about it.  Point conceded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vonnegut Talks About Art by Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/2010/01/21/vonnegut-talks-about-art/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 08:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/?p=751#comment-723</guid>
		<description>While I don&#039;t disagree, it just feels like it&#039;s not entirely encompassing of what I have experienced of art. If art was merely what people liked to look at, then would you classify cheesy, kitschy paintings of kittens as art? Lots of people like to look at the most cliche, unchallenging, and superficial things. What about pieces intended to evoke disgust or a general negative reaction from the viewer intentionally as part of its message? Is that not art?

Also, I&#039;ve seen tons of photos and pieces of art that really interest me and move me on a very deep level, and yet I know nothing of the person who created it. While yes, I could agree that if I DID know about them or knew them personally, it would likely increase my appreciation, and it certainly always interests me to understand who the artist is, where they come from, and what they want to say. But knowing these things aren&#039;t required for me to connect with their art. It generally only enhances the connection the art has already made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don&#8217;t disagree, it just feels like it&#8217;s not entirely encompassing of what I have experienced of art. If art was merely what people liked to look at, then would you classify cheesy, kitschy paintings of kittens as art? Lots of people like to look at the most cliche, unchallenging, and superficial things. What about pieces intended to evoke disgust or a general negative reaction from the viewer intentionally as part of its message? Is that not art?</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve seen tons of photos and pieces of art that really interest me and move me on a very deep level, and yet I know nothing of the person who created it. While yes, I could agree that if I DID know about them or knew them personally, it would likely increase my appreciation, and it certainly always interests me to understand who the artist is, where they come from, and what they want to say. But knowing these things aren&#8217;t required for me to connect with their art. It generally only enhances the connection the art has already made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vonnegut Talks About Art by Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/2010/01/21/vonnegut-talks-about-art/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/?p=751#comment-722</guid>
		<description>I agree with some of that.  &amp; definitely feel that paintings and such, that which I&#039;ll define as stagnant art as opposed to film or music which has movement, I know very little about the mechanics and how one criticizes it and, at least for me, think real meaning is derived from the knowledge of the artist &amp; what the work is intended to mean.  Otherwise, yes, it can be boiled down to being a picture one either likes to look at or doesn&#039;t.  

But I disagree that one can dismiss a piece of art outright or even like something without being able to convey why or that, with more time and knowledge, one couldn&#039;t also come to like something more than they did at first.

But once a piece of art, and in particular music and film (which are things i feel like I know a little about), is contextualized I think it can be judged.  

And not to belabor, that&#039;s my opinion and I&#039;d like to discuss it more in person with anyone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with some of that.  &amp; definitely feel that paintings and such, that which I&#8217;ll define as stagnant art as opposed to film or music which has movement, I know very little about the mechanics and how one criticizes it and, at least for me, think real meaning is derived from the knowledge of the artist &amp; what the work is intended to mean.  Otherwise, yes, it can be boiled down to being a picture one either likes to look at or doesn&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>But I disagree that one can dismiss a piece of art outright or even like something without being able to convey why or that, with more time and knowledge, one couldn&#8217;t also come to like something more than they did at first.</p>
<p>But once a piece of art, and in particular music and film (which are things i feel like I know a little about), is contextualized I think it can be judged.  </p>
<p>And not to belabor, that&#8217;s my opinion and I&#8217;d like to discuss it more in person with anyone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Sneak-Peak at the FishApp by matt</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/2009/06/04/a-sneak-peak-at-the-fishapp/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/?p=690#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Hi Jose, thanks for the comment.  I haven&#039;t started any work on the pH meter yet, but I bookmarked these web pages:
http://www.66pacific.com/ph/ph_1.htm
http://www.66pacific.com/ph/simplest_ph.aspx
and a rather full-blown implementation
http://code.google.com/p/phduino/
The last link also has a nice list of references.

Apparently the first one uses some pretty high voltages and currents - so please don&#039;t kill yourself if you follow that one.  I might not do that one either.

I have heard of R and have been meaning to check it out.  I&#039;ll have to give it a go (and finish that darn O&#039;Reilly Statistics book I started reading).

Hope that helps! I&#039;ve just about got the temperature sensor posting to my website - but I&#039;ve been having some power supply fluctuation issues, I think.  Another blog post will be following soon on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jose, thanks for the comment.  I haven&#8217;t started any work on the pH meter yet, but I bookmarked these web pages:<br />
<a href="http://www.66pacific.com/ph/ph_1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.66pacific.com/ph/ph_1.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.66pacific.com/ph/simplest_ph.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.66pacific.com/ph/simplest_ph.aspx</a><br />
and a rather full-blown implementation<br />
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/phduino/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/phduino/</a><br />
The last link also has a nice list of references.</p>
<p>Apparently the first one uses some pretty high voltages and currents &#8211; so please don&#8217;t kill yourself if you follow that one.  I might not do that one either.</p>
<p>I have heard of R and have been meaning to check it out.  I&#8217;ll have to give it a go (and finish that darn O&#8217;Reilly Statistics book I started reading).</p>
<p>Hope that helps! I&#8217;ve just about got the temperature sensor posting to my website &#8211; but I&#8217;ve been having some power supply fluctuation issues, I think.  Another blog post will be following soon on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Sneak-Peak at the FishApp by Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/2009/06/04/a-sneak-peak-at-the-fishapp/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/?p=690#comment-719</guid>
		<description>Hey,
Nice job!
This is a very good use for the Arduino, could you share the plans for the PH probe and the other probes too?
I would like to learn from your work so that I can add salinity, redox, etc...
I would also recommend you to try R, the statistics package, for handling your data and create some nice graphics.
Peace,
Jose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,<br />
Nice job!<br />
This is a very good use for the Arduino, could you share the plans for the PH probe and the other probes too?<br />
I would like to learn from your work so that I can add salinity, redox, etc&#8230;<br />
I would also recommend you to try R, the statistics package, for handling your data and create some nice graphics.<br />
Peace,<br />
Jose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fish Tank by Kenneth Slagell</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/2008/02/06/fish-tank/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Slagell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pedalboy.net/blog/?p=201#comment-714</guid>
		<description>I am Joe and Liz kids Grandpa...i.e. Camerons and Lukes Grandpa.

I need to know what type of sensors are available to hook to a PC and then I would like to have a hard out put, i.e. a relay driven output.  Example... a drive way sensor that could be recorded on a web site and maybe set off an alarm.    Details aren&#039;t clear....   but an example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am Joe and Liz kids Grandpa&#8230;i.e. Camerons and Lukes Grandpa.</p>
<p>I need to know what type of sensors are available to hook to a PC and then I would like to have a hard out put, i.e. a relay driven output.  Example&#8230; a drive way sensor that could be recorded on a web site and maybe set off an alarm.    Details aren&#8217;t clear&#8230;.   but an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FishApp &#8211; Water Change Detection by matt</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/2009/10/24/fishapp-water-change-detection/comment-page-1/#comment-712</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/?p=734#comment-712</guid>
		<description>Hey Angela, thanks for commenting!  I&#039;m going to send you an email on this too, but I wanted to put my comments out here for anyone else who may be lurking.

To tell you the truth, the Mastodon Dave I&#039;m building is my first pedal.  I&#039;m kindof in the same spot as you as far as not really knowing how stuff works.  I have a couple pieces of advice though.  It would be a good idea just to learn about electronics in general.  What a diode does, what a transistor does, how to do some simple circuits.  I&#039;ve heard that Getting Started in Electronics By Forrest Mims is really good for that sort of thing.  I haven&#039;t read it myself (it&#039;s on my Christmas list), but I do have one of Mims&#039; other books and it&#039;s AWESOME.

I emailed my other pedalbuilding buddy Ian, because he&#039;s done a lot more research into it than I have.  He&#039;s also spent a lot of time looking at schematics and forums and definitely has a better handle on where to start and what resources are out there than I do.  Here&#039;s what he recommended as far as getting started:

* Sign up for the forums at www.freestompboxes.com and http://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/. Between those two you can find probably anything you&#039;re looking for. You&#039;ll have a better chance at finding more boutique pedals at freestompboxes since they have an &quot;anything goes&quot; mentality and diystompboxes has a list of pedals that they will not post information on. For a third website I would recommend www.beavisaudio.com or http://www.buildyourownclone.com/board/. Beavis has less tech information, but a lot of awesome projects (you have to really search his site to find them though, kind of annoying) and the other is another message board (i hardly go there). For buying parts, www.smallbearelec.com is pretty good.

I&#039;m taking the approach of trying to learn electronics more generally and then how it applies to building pedals more specifically.  That way I can use what I learned on Arduino projects and stuff like that.

It would also be useful to have a basic idea about how sound is represented as voltage in electronics, and some basic acoustics stuff.  That way, if you know that a diode only allows current in one direction through it, and you know that a sine wave is passing through it, you should be able to think &quot;okay that&#039;s going to get chopped, so you&#039;ll have peaks only (no valleys), and that will probably sound a little more like a square wave.  Buzzy.&quot;  Another thing that pedals do a lot is slightly overload transistors, op amps, or power supplies (i think they do the last one, anyway.  I could be wrong).  Each component is going to respond slightly differently when used outside of it&#039;s normal operating range, and that usually means distortion (higher-order harmonics being added to the signal).

There you have it.  That&#039;s pretty much the entire extent of my pedal-building electronics knowledge.  You may have known all that already!  Hope it helps.  Post a link to your projects if you have them online anywhere.  I&#039;m about to start work on my Mastodon again (I was waiting to get it painted but the artist wife is swamped), so expect to see a post or two here on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Angela, thanks for commenting!  I&#8217;m going to send you an email on this too, but I wanted to put my comments out here for anyone else who may be lurking.</p>
<p>To tell you the truth, the Mastodon Dave I&#8217;m building is my first pedal.  I&#8217;m kindof in the same spot as you as far as not really knowing how stuff works.  I have a couple pieces of advice though.  It would be a good idea just to learn about electronics in general.  What a diode does, what a transistor does, how to do some simple circuits.  I&#8217;ve heard that Getting Started in Electronics By Forrest Mims is really good for that sort of thing.  I haven&#8217;t read it myself (it&#8217;s on my Christmas list), but I do have one of Mims&#8217; other books and it&#8217;s AWESOME.</p>
<p>I emailed my other pedalbuilding buddy Ian, because he&#8217;s done a lot more research into it than I have.  He&#8217;s also spent a lot of time looking at schematics and forums and definitely has a better handle on where to start and what resources are out there than I do.  Here&#8217;s what he recommended as far as getting started:</p>
<p>* Sign up for the forums at <a href="http://www.freestompboxes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.freestompboxes.com</a> and <a href="http://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/" rel="nofollow">http://www.diystompboxes.com/smfforum/</a>. Between those two you can find probably anything you&#8217;re looking for. You&#8217;ll have a better chance at finding more boutique pedals at freestompboxes since they have an &#8220;anything goes&#8221; mentality and diystompboxes has a list of pedals that they will not post information on. For a third website I would recommend <a href="http://www.beavisaudio.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.beavisaudio.com</a> or <a href="http://www.buildyourownclone.com/board/" rel="nofollow">http://www.buildyourownclone.com/board/</a>. Beavis has less tech information, but a lot of awesome projects (you have to really search his site to find them though, kind of annoying) and the other is another message board (i hardly go there). For buying parts, <a href="http://www.smallbearelec.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.smallbearelec.com</a> is pretty good.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m taking the approach of trying to learn electronics more generally and then how it applies to building pedals more specifically.  That way I can use what I learned on Arduino projects and stuff like that.</p>
<p>It would also be useful to have a basic idea about how sound is represented as voltage in electronics, and some basic acoustics stuff.  That way, if you know that a diode only allows current in one direction through it, and you know that a sine wave is passing through it, you should be able to think &#8220;okay that&#8217;s going to get chopped, so you&#8217;ll have peaks only (no valleys), and that will probably sound a little more like a square wave.  Buzzy.&#8221;  Another thing that pedals do a lot is slightly overload transistors, op amps, or power supplies (i think they do the last one, anyway.  I could be wrong).  Each component is going to respond slightly differently when used outside of it&#8217;s normal operating range, and that usually means distortion (higher-order harmonics being added to the signal).</p>
<p>There you have it.  That&#8217;s pretty much the entire extent of my pedal-building electronics knowledge.  You may have known all that already!  Hope it helps.  Post a link to your projects if you have them online anywhere.  I&#8217;m about to start work on my Mastodon again (I was waiting to get it painted but the artist wife is swamped), so expect to see a post or two here on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FishApp &#8211; Water Change Detection by Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/2009/10/24/fishapp-water-change-detection/comment-page-1/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matthewcgood.com/blog/?p=734#comment-711</guid>
		<description>Hey Matthew, I&#039;m totally digging your projects.  Especially the guitar pedal/circuit building.  I built a Landgraff Overdrive clone but learned the skills on the fly so I would like to learn more about what I&#039;m building, not just copying a schematic.  i.e. I would like to learn how the components actually lend to certain sounds and how to tweak said sounds to make &quot;new&quot; project pedals.  I don&#039;t know if you have tried anything outside of building clones, but I was wondering if you would be willing to share some links, knowledge or other info that you use for reference materials.  My email is _____@yahoo.com, any advice or information is greatly appreciated.  Thanks

(edited by matt to remove email address. don&#039;t want my readers getting spam!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Matthew, I&#8217;m totally digging your projects.  Especially the guitar pedal/circuit building.  I built a Landgraff Overdrive clone but learned the skills on the fly so I would like to learn more about what I&#8217;m building, not just copying a schematic.  i.e. I would like to learn how the components actually lend to certain sounds and how to tweak said sounds to make &#8220;new&#8221; project pedals.  I don&#8217;t know if you have tried anything outside of building clones, but I was wondering if you would be willing to share some links, knowledge or other info that you use for reference materials.  My email is <a href="mailto:_____@yahoo.com">_____@yahoo.com</a>, any advice or information is greatly appreciated.  Thanks</p>
<p>(edited by matt to remove email address. don&#8217;t want my readers getting spam!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
